NIH SciEd Nation Top BannerOSE Home

References

  • Aguirre, A. 2000. Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 27(6). (http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/99/28.pdf)
  • Alberts, B.M. 1993. A 10-Step Recipe for Starting a Partnership Program by Bruce M. Alberts. In: Sussman, A. Science Education Partnerships: Manual for Scientists and K-12 Teachers. San Francisco: University of California at San Francisco Press. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg1a.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Alberts, B. 2005. A wake up call. Cell 123:739-741. (http://download.cell.com/Cell/pdf/PIIS0092867405011827.pdf?intermediate=true External Web Site Policy)
  • Antonio, A.L., H.S. Astin, and C.M. Cress. 2000. Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. Review of Higher Education 23:373-398.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. (http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/default.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). 2008. Scientists in Science Education. Colorado Springs: BSCS. (http://science.education.nih.gov/sise)
  • Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Bringle, R.G., and J.A. Hatcher. 1995. A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2:112-122.
  • Busch, A. and K. D. Tanner. 2006. Developing Scientist Educators: Analysis of Integrating K-12 Pedagogy and Partnership Experiences into Graduate Science Training. San Francisco, CA: 2006 NARST Annual Conference.(http://www.sfsu.edu/~sepal/publications/narst_2006_busch.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Colbeck, C.L., and P. Wharton-Michael. 2006. Individual and organizational influences on faculty members’ engagement in public scholarship. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 105:17-26.
  • Center on Education Policy. 2008. Has Student Achievement Increased Since 2002? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. (http://www.cep-dc.org/document/docWindow.cfm?fuseaction=document.viewDocument&documentid=241&documentFormatId=4309 External Web Site Policy)
  • Curtis, J.W., and M.F. Jacobe. 2006. Consequences: An Increasingly Contingent Faculty. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors. (http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/research/conind2006.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Dillon, E., and A.J. Rotherham. 2007. States’ Evidence: What It Means to Make ‘Adequate Yearly Progress’ under NCLB. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/EXPAYP.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Driscoll, A., and E. Lynton. 1997. Documenting professional service: A progress report. Metropolitan Universities 8(1):19-37.
  • Eckelmeyer, K.H., ed. Science Education in Our Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Guide for Technical Professionals Who Want to Help. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
  • Fairweather, J.E. 2005. Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education 76(4):401-22.
  • Franks S., J. McDonnell, C. Peach, E. Simms, and A. Thorrold. 2006. Education and Public Outreach: A Guide for Scientists. Rockville, MD: The Oceanography Society. (http://www.cosee.net/files/coseenet/epo_guide2.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Heppner, F. 2009. On the bottom line, good teaching tops good research. Chronicle of Higher Education 55(27):A72. (http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i27/27a07201.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Hollweg, K.S., and D. Hill, eds. 2003. What Is the Influence of the National Science Education Standards?: Reviewing the Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10618 External Web Site Policy)
  • Institute of Education Sciences of the National Center for Education Statistics. 2008. An Introduction to NAEP. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/about/introduction_to_naep_2008.pdf)
  • Ivie, R., S. Guo, and A. Carr. 2005. 2004 Physics and Astronomy Academic Workforce. AIP Report R-392.6. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. (http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/awf.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • June, A.W. 2008. Teaching, research, and service by the numbers at Boise State. Chronicle of Higher Education 54(45):B24. (http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i45/45b02401.htm?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en External Web Site Policy)
  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. 2000. Renewing the Covenant: Learning, Discovery, and Engagement in a New Age and Different World. Washington, DC: National Association of State University and Land-Grant Colleges. (https://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=186 External Web Site Policy)
  • Kyle, W.C., Jr. et al. 1985. What research says -- Science through discovery: Students love it. Science and Children 23(2):39-41.
  • Link, A.N., C.A. Swann, and B. Bozeman. 2008. A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review 27:363-374.
  • Lotkowski, V.A., S.B. Robbins, and R.J. Noeth. 2004. The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention. Princeton, NJ: ACT Policy Report. (http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/college_retention.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Mason, M.A., M. Goulden, and K. Frasch. 2009. Why graduate students reject the fast track. Academe 95(1):11-16. (http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2009/JF/Feat/maso.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Michaels, S., A.W. Shouse, H.A. Schweingruber et al. 2008. Ready, Set, Science!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11882 External Web Site Policy)
  • Morrow, C.A. 2000. Misconceptions Scientists Often Have about the National Science Education Standards. Boulder, CO: Space Science Institute. (http://www.spacescience.org/education/papers/misconceptions.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Murnane, R.J., and F. Levy. 1996. Teaching the New Basic Skills: Principles for Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: The Free Press.
  • Narode, R. et al. 1987. Teaching Thinking Skills: Science. Washington, DC: National Education Association. ED 320 755.
  • National Academies of Science. 2005. Roles for Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. (http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/roles.html External Web Site Policy).
  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine: Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century, an Agenda for American Science and Technology. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2007. The Nation’s Report Card: 12th-Grade Reading and Mathematics 2005. W. Grigg, P. Donahue, and G. Dion. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_grade12_2005/).
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). 2005. The Condition of Education 2005. (http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). 2009a.Gaining Public Trust through Understanding. (http://www.genome.gov/12012399)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). 2009b.Fostering Equity in the Classroom. (http://www.genome.gov/12012401)
  • National Research Council (NRC), National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9596 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC), Committee on State Standards in Education. 2007. A. Beatty, rapporteur. Assessing the Role of K-12 Academic Standards in States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12207.html External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC), Committee on State Standards in Education. 2008. A. Beatty, rapporteur. Common Standards for K-12 Education? Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12462.html External Web Site Policy)
  • O'Meara, K.A. 2005. Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship. Research in Higher Education 46(5):479-510.
  • Rakow, S.J. 1986. Teaching Science as Inquiry. Fastback 246. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ED 275 506.
  • Resources for Involving Scientists in Education (RISE) Working Conference on Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. 1996a. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg6.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Resources for Involving Scientists in Education (RISE) Working Conference on Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. 1996b. A Roadmap for Participation in Partnerships. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg1b.htm External Web Site Policy )
  • Rodriguez, I., and L.J. Bethe. 1983. An inquiry approach to science and language teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20(4):291–96.
  • Rotherham, A. J. 2006. Making the Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=385844 External Web Site Policy)
  • Seymour, E., and N.M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Shapiro, H.N. 2006. Promotion and tenure and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Change 38(2):38-43.
  • Tanner, K., and D. Allen. 2004. Learning styles and the problem of instructional selection: Engaging all students in science courses. Cell Biology Education 3:197-201. (http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/3/4/197 External Web Site Policy)
  • Tanner, K., and D. Allen. 2006. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Science Education 5:1-6. (http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/8/2/89 External Web Site Policy)
  • Tierney, W.G., and E. M. Bensimon. 1996. Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. Albany: State University of New York Press. (http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/tenure-evaluation.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Tobias. S. 1990. They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucscon, AZ: Research Corp.
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2005. Tapping America's Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative. Washington, DC: Business Roundtable. (http://www.tap2015.org/about/TAP_report2.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Varlas, L. 2008. Full Service Community Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/infobrief/summer08/num54/full/Full-Service_Community_Schools.aspx External Web Site Policy)
  • Yeager, M. 2007. Understanding NAEP: Inside the Nation's Report Card. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/EXPNAEP.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Youn, T.I.K., and T.M. Price. 2009. Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. Journal of Higher Education 80(2):204-37.

About Us • Awards • Articles • Accessibility
Office of Science Education Home • Contact OSE • FOIA • Linking Policy • Privacy Policy
Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives • National Institutes of Health • Department of Health and Human Services
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal