NIH SciEd Nation Top BannerOSE Home

References

  • Aguirre, A. 2000. Women and Minority Faculty in the Academic Workplace. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 27(6). (http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/99/28.pdf)
  • Alberts, B.M. 1993. A 10-Step Recipe for Starting a Partnership Program by Bruce M. Alberts. In: Sussman, A. Science Education Partnerships: Manual for Scientists and K-12 Teachers. San Francisco: University of California at San Francisco Press. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg1a.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Alberts, B. 2005. A wake up call. Cell 123:739-741. (http://download.cell.com/Cell/pdf/PIIS0092867405011827.pdf?intermediate=true External Web Site Policy)
  • Antonio, A.L., H.S. Astin, and C.M. Cress. 2000. Community service in higher education: A look at the nation’s faculty. Review of Higher Education 23:373-398.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. (http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/default.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Biological Sciences Curriculum Study (BSCS). 2008. Scientists in Science Education. Colorado Springs: BSCS. (http://science.education.nih.gov/sise)
  • Boyer, E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Bringle, R.G., and J.A. Hatcher. 1995. A service-learning curriculum for faculty. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 2:112-122.
  • Busch, A. and K. D. Tanner. 2006. Developing Scientist Educators: Analysis of Integrating K-12 Pedagogy and Partnership Experiences into Graduate Science Training. San Francisco, CA: 2006 NARST Annual Conference.(http://www.sfsu.edu/~sepal/publications/narst_2006_busch.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Colbeck, C.L., and P. Wharton-Michael. 2006. Individual and organizational influences on faculty members’ engagement in public scholarship. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 105:17-26.
  • Center on Education Policy. 2008. Has Student Achievement Increased Since 2002? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. (http://www.cep-dc.org/document/docWindow.cfm?fuseaction=document.viewDocument&documentid=241&documentFormatId=4309 External Web Site Policy)
  • Curtis, J.W., and M.F. Jacobe. 2006. Consequences: An Increasingly Contingent Faculty. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors. (http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/research/conind2006.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Dillon, E., and A.J. Rotherham. 2007. States’ Evidence: What It Means to Make ‘Adequate Yearly Progress’ under NCLB. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/EXPAYP.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Driscoll, A., and E. Lynton. 1997. Documenting professional service: A progress report. Metropolitan Universities 8(1):19-37.
  • Eckelmeyer, K.H., ed. Science Education in Our Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Guide for Technical Professionals Who Want to Help. Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
  • Fairweather, J.E. 2005. Beyond the rhetoric: Trends in the relative value of teaching and research in faculty salaries. Journal of Higher Education 76(4):401-22.
  • Franks S., J. McDonnell, C. Peach, E. Simms, and A. Thorrold. 2006. Education and Public Outreach: A Guide for Scientists. Rockville, MD: The Oceanography Society. (http://www.cosee.net/files/coseenet/epo_guide2.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Heppner, F. 2009. On the bottom line, good teaching tops good research. Chronicle of Higher Education 55(27):A72. (http://chronicle.com/weekly/v55/i27/27a07201.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Hollweg, K.S., and D. Hill, eds. 2003. What Is the Influence of the National Science Education Standards?: Reviewing the Evidence. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=10618 External Web Site Policy)
  • Institute of Education Sciences of the National Center for Education Statistics. 2008. An Introduction to NAEP. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. (http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/about/introduction_to_naep_2008.pdf)
  • Ivie, R., S. Guo, and A. Carr. 2005. 2004 Physics and Astronomy Academic Workforce. AIP Report R-392.6. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics. (http://www.aip.org/statistics/trends/reports/awf.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • June, A.W. 2008. Teaching, research, and service by the numbers at Boise State. Chronicle of Higher Education 54(45):B24. (http://chronicle.com/weekly/v54/i45/45b02401.htm?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en External Web Site Policy)
  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. 2000. Renewing the Covenant: Learning, Discovery, and Engagement in a New Age and Different World. Washington, DC: National Association of State University and Land-Grant Colleges. (https://www.aplu.org/NetCommunity/Document.Doc?id=186 External Web Site Policy)
  • Kyle, W.C., Jr. et al. 1985. What research says -- Science through discovery: Students love it. Science and Children 23(2):39-41.
  • Link, A.N., C.A. Swann, and B. Bozeman. 2008. A time allocation study of university faculty. Economics of Education Review 27:363-374.
  • Lotkowski, V.A., S.B. Robbins, and R.J. Noeth. 2004. The Role of Academic and Non-Academic Factors in Improving College Retention. Princeton, NJ: ACT Policy Report. (http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/college_retention.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Mason, M.A., M. Goulden, and K. Frasch. 2009. Why graduate students reject the fast track. Academe 95(1):11-16. (http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2009/JF/Feat/maso.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Michaels, S., A.W. Shouse, H.A. Schweingruber et al. 2008. Ready, Set, Science!: Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11882 External Web Site Policy)
  • Morrow, C.A. 2000. Misconceptions Scientists Often Have about the National Science Education Standards. Boulder, CO: Space Science Institute. (http://www.spacescience.org/education/papers/misconceptions.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Murnane, R.J., and F. Levy. 1996. Teaching the New Basic Skills: Principles for Educating Children to Thrive in a Changing Economy. New York: The Free Press.
  • Narode, R. et al. 1987. Teaching Thinking Skills: Science. Washington, DC: National Education Association. ED 320 755.
  • National Academies of Science. 2005. Roles for Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. (http://www.nationalacademies.org/rise/roles.html External Web Site Policy).
  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS), National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine: Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century, an Agenda for American Science and Technology. 2007. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). 2007. The Nation’s Report Card: 12th-Grade Reading and Mathematics 2005. W. Grigg, P. Donahue, and G. Dion. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. (http://nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_grade12_2005/).
  • National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). 2005. The Condition of Education 2005. (http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). 2009a.Gaining Public Trust through Understanding. (http://www.genome.gov/12012399)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). 2009b.Fostering Equity in the Classroom. (http://www.genome.gov/12012401)
  • National Research Council (NRC), National Committee on Science Education Standards and Assessment. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=4962 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=9596 External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC), Committee on State Standards in Education. 2007. A. Beatty, rapporteur. Assessing the Role of K-12 Academic Standards in States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12207.html External Web Site Policy)
  • National Research Council (NRC), Committee on State Standards in Education. 2008. A. Beatty, rapporteur. Common Standards for K-12 Education? Washington, DC: National Academies Press. (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/12462.html External Web Site Policy)
  • O'Meara, K.A. 2005. Encouraging multiple forms of scholarship. Research in Higher Education 46(5):479-510.
  • Rakow, S.J. 1986. Teaching Science as Inquiry. Fastback 246. Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. ED 275 506.
  • Resources for Involving Scientists in Education (RISE) Working Conference on Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. 1996a. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg6.htm External Web Site Policy)
  • Resources for Involving Scientists in Education (RISE) Working Conference on Scientists and Engineers in the Schools. 1996b. A Roadmap for Participation in Partnerships. (http://www.nas.edu/rise/backg1b.htm External Web Site Policy )
  • Rodriguez, I., and L.J. Bethe. 1983. An inquiry approach to science and language teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 20(4):291–96.
  • Rotherham, A. J. 2006. Making the Cut: How States Set Passing Scores on Standardized Tests. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/research/research_show.htm?doc_id=385844 External Web Site Policy)
  • Seymour, E., and N.M. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Shapiro, H.N. 2006. Promotion and tenure and the scholarship of teaching and learning. Change 38(2):38-43.
  • Tanner, K., and D. Allen. 2004. Learning styles and the problem of instructional selection: Engaging all students in science courses. Cell Biology Education 3:197-201. (http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/3/4/197 External Web Site Policy)
  • Tanner, K., and D. Allen. 2006. Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Science Education 5:1-6. (http://www.lifescied.org/cgi/content/full/8/2/89 External Web Site Policy)
  • Tierney, W.G., and E. M. Bensimon. 1996. Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. Albany: State University of New York Press. (http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/tenure-evaluation.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Tobias. S. 1990. They're Not Dumb, They're Different: Stalking the Second Tier. Tucscon, AZ: Research Corp.
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce. 2005. Tapping America's Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative. Washington, DC: Business Roundtable. (http://www.tap2015.org/about/TAP_report2.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Varlas, L. 2008. Full Service Community Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (http://www.ascd.org/publications/newsletters/infobrief/summer08/num54/full/Full-Service_Community_Schools.aspx External Web Site Policy)
  • Yeager, M. 2007. Understanding NAEP: Inside the Nation's Report Card. Washington, DC: Education Sector. (http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/EXPNAEP.pdf External Web Site Policy)
  • Youn, T.I.K., and T.M. Price. 2009. Learning from the experience of others: The evolution of faculty tenure and promotion rules in comprehensive institutions. Journal of Higher Education 80(2):204-37.

About Us Awards Articles Accessibility
Office of Science Education Home Contact OSE FOIA Linking Policy Privacy Policy
Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives National Institutes of Health Department of Health and Human Services
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal